Barre Granite Ass'n v. Fasolino Monuments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that motions to strike “are viewed unfavorably” and “will be denied, unless it can be shown that no evidence in support of the allegation would be admissible”
• describing “scandalous material” as that which “reflects unnecessarily on the defendant’s moral character, or uses repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court”
• “Whether to grant or deny a motion to strike is vested in the trial court’s sound discretion.” (internal citations omitted)
• “Whether to grant or deny a motion to strike is vested in the trial court’s sound discretion.”
• “[A] scandalous allegation has been described as one that reflects unnecessarily on the defendant's moral character, or uses repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court.”
• “[A] scandalous allegation has been described as one that reflects unnecessarily on the defendant's moral character, or uses repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).