Supreme Court· 2/5/1945

Barr v. United States

Citations

324 U.S. 83
65 S. Ct. 522
89 L. Ed. 765
1945 U.S. LEXIS 2630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \the buying rate\ for foreign currency under the Tariff Act of 1930, 31 U.S.C. Sec. 372, included more than one buying rate
holding that \the buying rate\ for foreign currency under the Tariff Act of 1930, 31 U.S.C. § 372, included more than one buying rate
“[I]f Congress has made a choice of language which fairly brings a given situation within a statute, it is unimportant that the particular application may not have been contemplated by the legislators.”
“[I]f Congress has made a choice of language which fairly brings a given situation within a statute, it is unimportant that the particular application may not have been contemplated by the legislators.”
“[I]f Congress has made a choice of language which fairly brings a given situation within a statute, it is unimportant that the particular application may not have been contemplated by the legislators.”
“[I]f Congress has made a choice of language that fairly brings a given situation within a statute, it is unimportant that the particular application may not have been contemplated by the legislators.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Douglas, Frankfurter, Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

412 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Barr v. United States

32 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.