Skip to main content

Barr v. People

Citations

  • 113 Ill. 471
  • 1885 Ill. LEXIS 719

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal law—assault with intent to commit rape—of the proof •necessary to convict. Before one can be convicted of an assault with intent to commit a rape, it must appear, from the evidence, that he made an unlawful assault upon the prosecutrix, with intent feloniously and forcibly to ravish and carnally know her against her will.</p> <p>2. An instruction which may be held to imply that the jury may find the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to commit a rape upon a woman if he simply made an unlawful assault without such criminal intent, is positively bad, such not being the law.</p> <p>3. Same—of an instruction on the subject—as omitting an essential element, and assuming a material fact. On the trial of one for an assault with intent to commit a rape, the court instructed the jury as follows: rjTho jury are instructed, that if you believe, from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant made the assault as charged in the indictment, then, even though you believe, from the evidence, defendant afterwards held Mrs. B., * * * and they talked about S., then such subsequent talk could not justify or excuse the prior assault:” Held, that the instruction was erroneous. If the words, “made the assault, ” be referred to the words in the indictment that he made an “unlawful assault,” and nothing more, it was bad, as omitting the criminal intent; and if they refer to an assault with intent to ravish, as charged, it is still more erroneous, in assuming there was a prior assault made.</p> <p>4. Same—of matters connected with an offer of defendant to compromise. On the trial of one for an assault with intent to commit a rape, it is proper for the prosecution to prove that the accused sent a party to the father of the prosecutrix, who was a married woman, to ascertain if the case could be compromised; but it is not proper to prove that the father said, in reply, that he had two farms, and that he would spend them both before he would compromise the

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.