Barr v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeal before entry of judgment did not divest trial court of jurisdiction where appeal was from interlocutory order
• stating entry of judgment is a prerequisite to this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction
• “The entry of an appropriate judgment is a prerequisite to this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction and an appeal filed while a post-trial motion is pending before the trial court will be considered premature.”
• “The entry of an appropriate judgment is a prerequisite to this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction and ‘an appeal filed while a post-trial motion is pending before (Footnote Continued Next Page) J-A26031-21 alleges the trial court erred when it found: (1
• quashing appeal as interlocutory and also remanding for further proceedings
• “Once a post-trial motion is timely filed, judgment cannot be entered until the trial court enters an order disposing of the motion or the motion is denied by operation of law one hundred and twenty days after the filing of the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).