· 1/6/1994
Barr v. Barberry Bros., Inc.
Citations
- 635 A.2d 64
- 99 Md. App. 33
- 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “when substantive changes are made it indicates an intent to change the meaning of that statute” (internal quotation omitted)
- recognizing that “when substantive changes are made it indicates an intent to change the meaning of that statute” (internal quotation omitted)
- recognizing that “when substantive changes are made it indicates an intent to change the meaning of that statute” (internal quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Wenner, Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.