Skip to main content
· 1/23/2002

Barows v. State

Citations

  • 805 So. 2d 120
  • 2002 WL 84253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the trial court erred in prohibiting appellant from cross-examination of State witness regarding the witness' potential civil forfeiture of money \where such evidence was relevant to show bias or motive to lie\
  • finding the trial court erred in prohibiting appellant from cross-examination of State witness regarding the witness’ potential civil forfeiture of money “where such evidence was relevant to show bias or motive to lie”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.