Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/22/1988

Baroldy v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Citations

760 P.2d 574
157 Ariz. 574
4 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18
1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that manifestation of toxic shock syndrome in North Carolina from defective diaphragm was merely fortuitous because “Plaintiffs could have duplicated their relationship with [defendant] anywhere”
finding that in failure to warn cases “the ‘place of conduct’ is where the tortuous decision is made”
concluding manifestation of disease in North Carolina from diaphragm use fortuitous as plaintiff could have used device in any state
holding with failure-to-warn claim, place of conduct is where tortious decision was made
noting that “when the law of two states does not conflict, the contacts from those two states should be considered as if they were from the state involved in the choice of law question”
upholding trial court’s admission, with limiting instruction, of various documents for purposes of impeaching manufacturer’s claim that its product could not have caused the plaintiff’s injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Jacobson, Brooks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.