Skip to main content
· 3/5/1921

Barnum v. Hunter

Citations

  • 76 Pa. Super. 1
  • 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 76

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Building contracts — Construction—Parol evidence— Contradiction.</p> <p>In an action by a subcontractor against a building contractor, for damages claimed for a breach of contract to purchase steel cells from the plaintiff at a certain price, it was error to submit to the jury evidence of a parol contemporaneous agreement which was substantially the same as the written contract between the parties. The written evidence in the case having established the contract, and a liability on the part of the defendant, the matter was for the court and a verdict should have been directed for the plaintiff.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.