District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/11/2001
Barnhill v. State
Citations
- 788 So. 2d 313
- 2001 WL 564205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confirming that, prior to the enactment of subsection (5), habitualization did not have to be based on sequential convictions or offenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-20· cited 93×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-10· cited 55×
- Rhodes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-30· cited 31×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-13· cited 19×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-20· cited 10×
- Brumley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 9×
- Gavlick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-11· cited 6×
- Nazworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.