Barnhart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not § 11, armed robbery/kidnap/assault with a deadly weapon with intent do not violate double jeopardy even if offenses arose from single continuing transaction, as each crime separate & distinct with dissimilar proof
• not § 11, armed robbery/kidnap/assault with a deadly weapon with intent do not violate double jeopardy even if offenses arose from single continuing transaction, as each crime separate & distinct with dissimilar proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hale v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-20· cited 35×
• Clay v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1979-04-09· cited 31×
• Parker v. Crist
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-12-26· cited 11×
• Hoffman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1980-05-13· cited 11×
• Dangerfield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-04-12· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tucker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1971-02-03· cited 34×
• Kupiec v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1972-01-19· cited 26×
• Grubb v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1972-05-18· cited 12×