Barnhart v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ark. Const. amend. 65 superseded the prohibition on the issuance of evidences of indebtedness contained in Ark. Const. art. 16 , § 1
• City of Fayetteville did not have authority to levy household fee to retire bonds of sanitation authority
• monthly surcharge that was unrelated to sanitation services provided by the city held to be a \tax\
• $2.02 city sanitation charge used to wrap up sanitation authority's debt was a tax and not a fee because unrelated to the services provided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).