Barney Samuel Bradshaw v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plain language of Rule 403 does not allow court to exclude otherwise relevant evidence “when that evidence is merely prejudicial”
• providing that appellant failed to preserve the issue for review by failing to lodge a Rule 403 objection to his extraneous-offense evidence at trial
• noting that –30– Rule 403 does not allow exclusion of otherwise relevant evidence when evidence is merely prejudicial
• noting that –30– Rule 403 does not allow exclusion of otherwise relevant evidence when evidence is merely prejudicial
• providing that appellant failed to preserve the issue for review by failing to lodge a Rule 403 objection to his extraneous-offense evidence at trial
• noting that evidence of a separate sexual offense against a child admitted under article 38.37, section 2(b) is probative of a defendant’s character or propensity to commit sexual assaults on children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).