Barnette v. Brook Road, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on National Bank of Oregon v. Independent Ins. Agents of America, Inc., 508 U.S. 439, 462, 113 S.Ct. 2173, 124 L.Ed.2d 402 (1993)
• “Had the General Assembly intended to limit ‘actual damages’ to economic damages or out-of-pocket expenses, thereby altering the existing court definition, it must have done so expressly.”
• plaintiff’s allegations that car dealership made material false statements with intent to mislead plaintiff into signing purchase agreement stated a tort claim for fraud under Virginia law
• “Had the General Assembly intended to limit ‘actual damages’ to economic damages or out- of-pocket expenses, thereby altering the existing court definition, it must have done so expressly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).