Skip to main content
· 6/19/2008

Barnett v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 164 Cal. App. 4th 18
  • 79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an arbitration agreement to be procedurally 2 unconscionable, noting, inter alia, that there is an element of surprise where an 3 employee had “no reasonable opportunity to read or review the DRP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.