Skip to main content

Barnett v. State

Citations

  • 300 Ga. 551
  • 796 S.E.2d 653
  • 2017 WL 473905
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “constitutional guarantee of due process is not concerned with mere appearances of 94 partiality” but with “actual bias” (citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied)
  • concluding trial counsel’s strategy of advising defendant not to testify while offering alternative narrative of events to the jury was not deficient performance and was reasonable in an effort to avoid “damaging cross-examination”
  • \[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.\
  • trial judge’s prior representation of a victim in an unrelated matter did not demonstrate actual bias
  • “[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • defendant could not show counsel’s advice not to testify was deficient performance where counsel’s strategy was to show that defendant acted in self-defense without subjecting him to damaging cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.