· 3/1/1941
Barnett v. Pitcairn
Citations
- 309 Ill. App. 201
- 32 N.E.2d 979
- 1941 Ill. App. LEXIS 948
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A claim for contribution is not a matured claim as contemplated under Rule 13(e) because such claim is contingent upon a verdict and judgment establishing liability of a party as a joint tortfeasor. Since Rule 13(e
- “This language [in Rule 14(a)(1)] clearly recognizes contingent liability.”
- “This language [in Rule 14(a)(1)] clearly recognizes contingent liability.”
- supporting this interpretation of Rule 21
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.