Skip to main content
· 9/3/2010

Barnett v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 238 P.3d 324
  • 44 Kan. App. 2d 498
  • 2010 Kan. App. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issues concerning whether an Intoxilyzer machine was properly tested in order to maintain its certification with the KDHE were not issues encompassed by K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 8-1020[h][2][D]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Standridge, Green, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.