Barnett v. Destiny Owners Ass'n, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Friedman v. Virginia Metal Prods. Corp., 56 So.2d 515, 517 (Fla.1952)
• “If the contract is ambiguous, the trial court should construe the contract and consider parol evidence to determine the parties’ intent.”
• \Language in a document is ambiguous when it is uncertain in meaning and may be fairly understood in more ways than one and is susceptible of interpretation in opposite ways.\
• “Language in a document is ambiguous when it is uncertain in meaning and may be fairly understood in more ways than one and is susceptible of interpretation in opposite ways.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).