Barnett v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The purpose ... [for] generally prohibiting evidence of prior sexual conduct of a complaining witness is to insure that the witness does not become the party on trial through the admission of evidence that is neither material nor relevant to the charge made.” Id.
• \The purpose ... [for] generally prohibiting evidence of prior sexual conduct of a complaining witness is to insure that the witness does not become the party on trial through the admission of evidence that is neither material nor relevant to the charge made.\ Id.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. Brooks
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-05-21· cited 138×
• Beaty v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-10-23· cited 97×
• Montgomery v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 33×
• Anderson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-09-27· cited 27×
• Violett v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 23×
• Ward v. Commonwealth
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-14· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Young v. Newsome
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1971-01-29· cited 12×
• Ford v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-10-22· cited 5×
• Bixler v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-05-16· cited 4×