Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 9/23/1982
Barnett v. Barnett
Citations
- 640 S.W.2d 776
- 1982 Tex. App. LEXIS 5247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A motion for enforcement must, in ordinary and conscise language . . . state the relief requested by the movant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, Price, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Khalaf v. WilliamsTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-08-22· cited 24×
- In Re ParksTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-08-14· cited 16×
- Breault, Robert O. v. John PsarovarkasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-02-28
- in Re Kristin ParksTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-08-14
- in Re Ronald J. SannerTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-05-20
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-15· cited 61×
- Harrison v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-23· cited 35×
- Houtchens v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-20· cited 32×
- Texaco, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-17· cited 31×
- Whitley v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-20· cited 26×
- Frank v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-06· cited 9×
- Martin v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.