Barnes v. Winford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The grantor], therefore, retained a possibility of reverter interest in the land occupied by the right-of-way which would vest automatically when and if the [r]ailroad ceased to use the right-of- way for ‘railway purposes.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).