Barnes v. Warner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although the defendant's claim of evidentiary prejudice was somewhat speculative, that fact is not significant because of the state's failure to show good cause for the significant delay between the defendant's arrest and trial
• stating that although the defendant’s claim of evidentiary prejudice was somewhat speculative, that fact is not significant because of the state’s failure to show good cause for the significant delay between the defendant’s arrest and trial
• court reporter’s tardiness falls within general category of delay caused by personnel which “while weighing less heavily against the prosecution, nevertheless is chargeable against the State”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).