Barnes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant must establish that he was prejudiced by the discovery violation
• concluding trial courts may adopt State’s Response in summarily denying postconviction relief
• allowing for a summary denial -rather than providing rationale- of a Rule 3.850 motion by incorporating a response from the state as long as the state has provided the necessary record documents
• “[T]he rules of criminal and appellate procedure do not preclude a court from incorporating a response from the State if the State has provided the necessary record documents.” (citing Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460, 461 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-07· cited 2×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 2×
• Lawrenson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-23· cited 1×
• EDWIN ROLLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-08
• Puente v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-06
• Shane Kopp v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• Anderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 90×
• Langdon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-17· cited 33×
• Collins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-10· cited 7×
• Dieudonne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-12· cited 3×