Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]e will not reverse a decision on the basis of an erroneous jury instruction where the error is harmless”
• stating that “[w]e will not reverse a decision on the basis of an erroneous jury instruction where the error is harmless”
• holding new trial improper “if a reasonable juror could have reached the challenged verdict”
• holding new trial improper “if a reasonable juror could have reached the challenged verdict”
• observing that not every statement made in court filings necessarily counts as an admission
• reading KRS 411 .182(2) to require a finding of fault before apportionment is allowed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).