Illinois Supreme Court· 9/15/1876
Barnes v. Johnson
Citations
- 84 Ill. 95
Syllabus
<p>Monet had and received—when action lies. The action for money had and received is an equitable action, and lies wjierever one party has obtained money which, in equity and good conscience, he ought not to he permitted to retain.</p>
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cole v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1904-11-21· cited 23×
- Bride v. StormerIllinois Supreme Court· 1938-04-15· cited 17×
- First National Bank v. GattonIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 15×
- Chemical National Bank v. City BankIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-04-02· cited 5×
- Brady v. HorvathIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-05-11· cited 5×
- School District No. 39 v. CaseyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1927-02-19· cited 3×
- Bayfield v. DefenbacherAppellate Court of Illinois· 1932-05-17· cited 1×
- Brady v. HorvathAppellate Court of Illinois· 1896-05-14
- Manhattan State Bank v. C. J. Moritz, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1925-07-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.