Barnes v. Ethan Allen, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a six-week-old note insufficient to qualify as a fitness-for-duty certification, because it was not relevant to the employee’s condition at the time the employee’s FMLA leave was concluded
• “Health related leaves are provisionally approved pending the receipt of the ‘Certification of Health Care Provider’ form.”
• statement that plaintiff could return to work in 4-6 weeks did not qualify as a certification under the FMLA because the statement “must be relevant to the employee [’s] condition at the time FMLA leave is concluded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).