Barnes v. Barnes
Citations
- 110 Cal. 418
- 42 P. 904
- 1895 Cal. LEXIS 1072
Syllabus
<p>Antenuptial Settlement—False Representations as to Character of Wife—Validity of Settlement.—An antenuptial settlement, made in contemplation of marriage, is based upon a sufficient consideration, and where the marriage has been consummated, and the relation of husband and wife has been maintained for several years, the antenuptial settlement cannot be set aside upon the ground that the wife personally, and by her friends and agents, falsely represented that she was a virtuous, worthy, chaste, and moral woman, whereas she was in fact a woman of unchaste and immoral character.</p> <p>Id.—Validity of Marriage — Previous Unchaste Conduct—Public Policy—Maxim.—Previous unchaste conduct, although concealed, does not invalidate a marriage; but public policy opens marriage as the gate, way for repentance and virtue, and the maxim caveat emptor governs in regard to a marriage settlement.</p>
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stratton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-05-09· cited 43×
- Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-04-29· cited 28×
- Schaub v. SchaubCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-10-31· cited 26×
- Vileta v. ViletaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-08-06· cited 15×
- Meagher v. MalekiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-07-18· cited 12×
- Aufort v. AufortCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-10-01· cited 9×
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-09-14· cited 4×
- Foy v. FoyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-02-25· cited 4×
- Sutton v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-03-10· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.