Barnes v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”
• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”
• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”
• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”
• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”
• recognizing that a scheduling order helps “to maximize judicial efficiency and minimize judicial inefficiency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gosman v. Gosman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-28· cited 16×
• Deckman v. Deckman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-30· cited 15×
• Borne v. Borne
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-11-08· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abare v. Abare
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-02-16· cited 20×
• Laccetti v. Laccetti
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-01-04· cited 11×