N.D. California· 9/1/2010
Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plan-Nonbargained Program
Citations
- 270 F.R.D. 488
- 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1301
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90486
- 2010 WL 3447885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the potential existence of [affirmative] defenses against absent class members does not, standing alone, make [the named plaintiff] inadequate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 6,595×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 1,381×
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisNinth Circuit· 1992-09-28· cited 950×
- Armstrong v. DavisNinth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 428×
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1964-03-26· cited 282×
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesNinth Circuit· 1973-12-07· cited 267×
- Nancy Walsh v. Nevada Department of Human Resources, Division of Healthcare, Finance and Policy State of NevadaNinth Circuit· 2006-12-18· cited 264×
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-26· cited 158×
- Wise v. Verizon Communications Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-08· cited 75×
- Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.N.D. California· 2008-10-10· cited 36×
- Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co.Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-25· cited 28×
- In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. Georgia· 2007-09-07· cited 26×
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationC.D. California· 2007-10-22· cited 22×
- Winkler v. DTE, Inc.D. Arizona· 2001-12-06· cited 20×
- McCluskey v. Trustees of Red Dot Corp. Employee Stock Ownership PlanW.D. Washington· 2010-04-23· cited 14×
- In Re: Household International Tax Reduction PlanSeventh Circuit· 2006-03-20· cited 11×
- Alday v. Raytheon Co.D. Arizona· 2008-01-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.