Skip to main content
N.D. Georgia· 5/23/2017

Barnes v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Citations

  • 253 F. Supp. 3d 1168
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing complaint on \shotgun\ pleading grounds where pleading deficiencies were \particularly egregious\
  • “It is the duty of the parties and not that of this Court to formulate arguments in opposition to reasonable motions . . .”
  • “It is the duty of the parties and not that of this Court to formulate arguments in opposition to reasonable motions . . . .”
  • “Plaintiff’s failure to identify any specific statements upon which an express warranty could be based dooms this claim.”
  • “When an argument is raised upon [a] motion to dismiss that a claim is subject to dismissal, and the non-moving party fails to respond to such an argument, such claims are deemed abandoned and subject to dismissal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.