· 5/21/1986
Barnes-Hind, Inc. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 181 Cal. App. 3d 377
- 226 Cal. Rptr. 354
- 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2275
- 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statements that did not impute to the business owner, in connection with the sale of goods, fraud, dishonesty, or questionable business methods were not libel per se
- requiring a plaintiff “specially [to] plead and prove those 12 facts” to give the reader special knowledge of the circumstances
- “Perhaps the clearest example of libel per se is an accusation of crime.”
- “Perhaps the clearest example of libel per se is an accusation of crime.”
- “Perhaps the clearest example of [defamation] per se is an accusation of a crime.”
- “A corporation can be libeled by statements which injure its business reputation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.