Skip to main content
· 5/21/1986

Barnes-Hind, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 181 Cal. App. 3d 377
  • 226 Cal. Rptr. 354
  • 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2275
  • 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements that did not impute to the business owner, in connection with the sale of goods, fraud, dishonesty, or questionable business methods were not libel per se
  • requiring a plaintiff “specially [to] plead and prove those 12 facts” to give the reader special knowledge of the circumstances
  • “Perhaps the clearest example of libel per se is an accusation of crime.”
  • “Perhaps the clearest example of libel per se is an accusation of crime.”
  • “Perhaps the clearest example of [defamation] per se is an accusation of a crime.”
  • “A corporation can be libeled by statements which injure its business reputation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.