Barnard v. Wassermann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to pursue objections to an order in the district court amounted to waiver of a claim raised by plaintiff
• recognizing that “courts of general jurisdiction . . . possess certain inherent power to impose monetary sanctions on attorneys who by their conduct thwart the court’s scheduling and movement of cases through the court.”
• noting that trial courts have the power to impose sanctions to control the proceedings before them
• “This court has made clear that challenges to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time and cannot be waived.”
• \This court has made clear that challenges to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time and cannot be waived by the parties.\
• \Waiver is deemed to occur when the totality of the cireumstances indicates an intentional abandonment or relinquishment of a known constitutional right.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).