Barnard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to a charging document raised in a habeas petition should have been raised on direct appeal or in a postconviction motion
• “Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))
• \Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.\ (citing Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 , 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• SHIRD T. MYRICK v. MARK INCH, SECRETARY D. O. C.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-09
• GIVANNI TORRELL PARKS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-17
• Hudson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-16
• Anicet v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-09
• Comesanas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06
• Michael D. LoCascio v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-11· cited 1,190×