Barnard v. Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding any error regarding the admission of additional impeachment evidence harmless when the witness had already been heavily impeached
• noting the “powerful” nature of DNA evidence relative to other forms of evidence
• “Because this case was tried before January 1, 2013, our new Evidence Code does not apply.”
• “In doing so, we weigh the evidence as we would expect reasonable jurors to have done so, as opposed to assuming that they took the most pro-guilt possible view of every bit of evidence in the case.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).