Skip to main content
· 9/7/2005

Barmore v. Aidala

Citations

  • 419 F. Supp. 2d 193
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40888
  • 2005 WL 2154306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the defendants because the plaintiff did not address the defendants' personal involvement arguments in its opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss
  • dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the defendants because the plaintiff did not address the defendants' personal involvement arguments in its opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss
  • dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the defendants because the plaintiff did not address the defendants' personal involvement arguments in its opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss
  • dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the defendants because the plaintiff did not address the defendants' personal involvement arguments in its opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss
  • “If a certain fact is not contained in a properly supported paragraph in the movant’s [Statement of Material Facts], the Court need not consider that fact for purposes of the summary judgment motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAvoy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.