Barlow v. Gap, Inc.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4382
Syllabus
Ohio's Consumer Sales Practices Act, R.C. 1345.02(A), Ohio Adm.Code 109:4-3-02(A)(1), falsity, materiality, summary judgment, Civ.R. 56(C). The trial court did not err in granting The Gap's motion for summary judgment on Barlow's claim that The Gap's signs violated the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act. The Gap properly supported its motion with the pleadings and an affidavit. Barlow did not allege, argue, or present evidence that The Gap's signs were false, material, or misleading.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.