Skip to main content
· 2/6/1899

Barlaw v. Harrison

Citations

  • 51 La. Ann. 875
  • 25 So. 378
  • 1899 La. LEXIS 488

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The law presumes against fraud. Where acts are susceptible of two construe- . tions, one consistent with honesty and fair dealing, and the other odious and' criminal, the burden of proof is on the one who charges the latter and wishes the court to think that the odious and criminal is true.</p> <p>In a suit to have an olographic will decreed null, on the ground that it is not in the handwriting of the deceased and is a forgery, the weight of the testimony to justify a judgment annulling the will should make it appear, with some certainty, that the will is a forged paper.</p> <p>The presumption of regularity and honesty is sustained by the weight of the testimony.</p> <p>This was the conclusion arrived at by a jury of the vicinage who saw and heard the witnesses, and had special opportunity to judge of their credibility and' character. It was adopted by the Supreme Court as the basis of the judg- : ment.</p>

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.