Barksdale v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court lacked authority “to remand a case for the convenience of counsel”
• holding that district court lacked authority “to remand a case for the convenience of counsel”
• holding that court of appeals was authorized to review remand where remand was based on district court’s discretionary determination that remand would be more convenient for plaintiff’s counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).