Barksdale v. Louisiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 15 U. S. C. § 77k(e) is not an “express provision” under Rule 54(d) because it does not provide an “alternative standard” for awarding taxable costs
• “taxable costs [under Rule BY THE COURT: /s/ Chad F. Kenney CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE 54(d)] . . . do not include such litigation expenses as attorney’s fees and expert witness fees in excess of the standard daily witness fee.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).