Barkley v. United States Marshals Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, before termination, the officer was “given the opportunity to supply additional medical information responding to the specific concerns of the physician charged with making the final decision”
• discussing such a situation in Propert v. District of Columbia, 948 F.2d 1327 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
• finding procedures satisfied due process when any identified failure was a failure “in the individual’s response, not an inadequacy in the [given] procedures”
• “[T]he grant of leave to amend a complaint might often occasion some degree of delay and additional expense.”
• “claims against a federal agency—such as [ ] Rehabilitation Act claims . . . —must initially be brought before the employing agency itself.”
• same process under the Rehabilitation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).