Barkley v. Kerfoot
Citations
- 77 Wash. 556
- 137 P. 1046
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 942
Syllabus
<p>Garnishment — Liability of Garnishee — Contingent or TJnmatubed Debts — Rents to Fall Due. Where rent under a written lease has been paid to a judgment debtor for the current month in advance, the tenant cannot be held as a garnishee for installments of rent falling due after service of the garnishee process, under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 693, providing that a garnishee may be held if indebted to the principal defendant and such indebtedness has not matured and is not yet due and payable, the same to be paid into court when due; since this only covers indebtedness existing at the time of the garnishment, and a covenant to pay future installments of rent is too uncertain and contingent to be a present absolute indebtedness within the meaning of the statute.</p>
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wood v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1814-11-15· cited 51×
- Bellingham Bay Boom Co. v. BrisboisWashington Supreme Court· 1896-03-03· cited 26×
- Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court· 1913-05-24· cited 18×
- Marx v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1894-08-06· cited 17×
- Eureka Sandstone Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1894-02-12· cited 7×
- Buxbaum & Co. v. Dunham ex rel. KauffmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1894-01-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.