Barket, Levy & Fine, Inc. v. St. Louis Thermal Energy Corporation Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court may rely on hearsay evidence at 22 sentencing
• rejecting plaintiff's equal protection claim because plaintiff “did not qualify for the interruptible rate and thus is not similarly situated to those customers who negotiated 12 amended agreements”
• cf. cases giving preference to state residents over nonresidents, e.g. Williams v. Vermont , 472 U.S. 14 (1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).