Barker v. Whitney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the plaintiff could not maintain a discrimination claim suffered by other students and employees
• stating the elements of a Title IX retaliation claim and citing to Clausen v. Nat’l Geographic Soc’y, 664 F. Supp. 2d 1038, 1047– 48 (D.N.D. 2009) (relying on a Title VII case for the elements of a Title IX retaliation case) summarily aff’d 738 F. App’x 595 (8th Cir. 2010

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).