Barker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A judgment or sentence containing an irregularity which may be reformed on appeal or by nunc pro tunc entry is not void, and may not be collaterally attacked.”
• “A judgment or sentence containing an irregularity which may be reformed on appeal or by nunc pro tunc entry is not void, and may not be collaterally attacked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Olson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-26· cited 176×
• Rhodes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-07· cited 163×
• Bowles v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 48×
• Rhodes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-01-18· cited 23×
• Schofield v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-04· cited 3×
• Briones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-23· cited 3×
• Ronald Wayne Schofield v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-07-10
• Rhodes, Terry
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-07
• Simmons, Will Donnell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-28
• Marvin Lee Jones v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2024-08-26