Skip to main content
· 1/24/2008

Barker v. Missouri Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 513 F.3d 831
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1328
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,091
  • 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 803
  • 2008 WL 190775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the plaintiff must “demonstrate that he had an objectively reasonable belief” that the reported conduct constituted harassment
  • noting that if a plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie case of discrimination, the court need not address the other aspects of the burden-shifting framework
  • explaining that the FMLA’s “opposition clause is derived from Title VII”
  • explaining that the FMLA’s “opposition clause is derived from Title VII”
  • “Conduct is not actionable under Title VII if no reasonable person could have believed the incident violated Title VII's standard.”
  • plaintiff must allege facts supporting she had objectively reasonable belief 1 conduct at issue constituted sexual harassment under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Tashima, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.