Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2/4/2005

Barker v. Kruckenberg

Citations

33 Kan. App. 2d 545
105 P.3d 273
166 Oil & Gas Rep. 353
2005 Kan. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Plaintiffs do not challenge either finding in their present Motion.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caplinger, Malone, Marquardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Heiman v. Parrish
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-07-24· cited 44×
Cowman v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1935-12-07· cited 27×
In Re Harris Testamentary Trust
Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-06-06· cited 17×
Thurner v. Kaufman
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-05-10· cited 10×
Bloom v. Rugh
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1916-07-08· cited 8×
Templing v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1942-12-12· cited 8×
Citizens Building & Loan Ass'n of Emporia v. Jones
Supreme Court of Kansas· 1939-03-04· cited 5×
Rice v. Hillenburg
Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-12-16· cited 3×
M & C OIL, INC. v. Geffert
Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-06-23· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.