Skip to main content
· 1/22/1998

Barker v. International Paper Co.

Citations

  • 993 F. Supp. 10
  • 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1691
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 628
  • 1998 WL 59041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff has not alleged that Defendant held or acted upon any unfounded assumptions about Plaintiff on account of his wife’s disability.”
  • plaintiff who alleged he was terminated because of his advocacy on behalf of his wife and wife’s subsequent filing of a discrimination charge does not fall within the ADA association discrimination provision but may fall under the ADA’s prohibition against retaliation or coercion.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.