Skip to main content
· 4/21/1987

Barker v. Hull

Citations

  • 191 Cal. App. 3d 221
  • 236 Cal. Rptr. 285
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • matters decided in motion to vacate had preclusive effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newsom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.