Barker v. Huey
Citations
- 33 Wash. 79
- 73 P. 796
- 1903 Wash. LEXIS 490
Syllabus
<p>Judgments—Order Construing Will—Vacation—Appeal—Appealable Orders'. Where, upon application for the sale of certain real estate to pay debts of the estate, the parties appear and contest the matter, and the court finds that under the terms of the will certain other real estate is specifically charged with the payment of the debts, the order denying the petition can not be vacated for error of law, since it is final as a construction of the will and appealable, and subject to vacation only by the statutory steps.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imputing liability to owner where driver engaged in an unauthorized frolic
- imputing liability to owner where driver engaged in an unauthorized frolic
- “When a homestead to which the exemption from forced sale is attached is sold in violation of the exemption rights conferred by the Constitution, such sale is void. A mere failure to resist the sale is not a waiver of the exemption rights.”
- “When the evidence adduced as to the material issues in a cause is not conflicting, and the evidence . . . does not afford a sufficient legal basis for a verdict for the plaintiff, the trial judge may direct a verdict for the defendant.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunbar, Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.