Skip to main content
· 8/10/2011

Barker v. Goodrich

Citations

  • 649 F.3d 428
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16411
  • 2011 WL 3487019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing the use of handcuffs on a mentally ill prisoner under a conditions-of-confinement, as well as excessive-force, rubric
  • analyzing the use of handcuffs on a mentally ill prisoner under a conditions-of-confinement, as well as excessive-force, rubric
  • analyzing the use of handcuffs on a mentally ill prisoner under a conditions-of-confinement, as well as excessive-force, rubric
  • determining whether the defendants used excessive force by restraining the inmate in handcuffs in his cell
  • denying qualified immunity where sentenced inmate was handcuffed and placed in a detention cell for twelve hours, during which time he missed a meal, was unable to sit or lie down, use the restroom, or get water from the fountain
  • handcuffing nonresistant prisoner behind his back in his cell for twelve hours constituted an Eighth Amendment excessive force violation where prisoner “missed a meal and was unable to sit or lie down without pain, use restroom, or obtain water from fountain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Stranch, Zatkoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.